Legal Opinion
Dilley v. Gruver
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 5, 1936No. 4648Published
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
On the dates mentioned herein, J. H. and L. H. Gruver were duly qualified and acting public warehousemen under the Texas statute. As such they issued to appellant the following instrument:
“Warehouse Receipt
“Gruver, Texas, Sept. 12, 1932 No. 42 “J. H. Gruver & Son Elevator.
“Received for storage from D. C. Dil-ley.
“Address: Borger, Texas,
“5,000 Bushels of Wheat, in Gruver Elev a Gruver, Texas,
“Subject to his order hereon, on payment of all charges and surrender of this receipt properly endorsed.
“J. H. Gr.uver & Son Elevator'.
“By Guy Reed.”
The subject' matter of this suit is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Early-Foster Co. v. Mid-Tex Oil MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Sexton v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Security State Bank of Tahoka v. SpinnlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Burmarsal Co. v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- South Dakota Wheat Growers' Ass'n v. Farmers' Grain Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.