Legal Opinion
Marley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2009No. 06-36003PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed December 8, 2008, slip op. at 16067, 548 F.3d 1286, is replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Graber and Rawlinson have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wright has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court called for a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. On such vote, a majority of the nonrecused active judges failed to vote in favor of en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- A.Q.C. Ex Rel. Castillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Gabriela Arteaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Anthony Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.