Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway v. Cook

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1909No. 592PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the District Court, Big Horn County, HoN Carroll H. Parmelee, Jú'dge. The action was brought by C. A. Cook against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. From a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant prosecuted error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court, Big Horn County, HoN Carroll H. Parmelee, Jú'dge. The action was brought by C. A. Cook against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. From a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant prosecuted error. The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff having attempted to prove that the fire which was communicated to her property came from a particular engine of the defendant, it was improper to admit evidence to the effect that sparks were seen to escape from other engines of the defendant. (Gibbons v. R. R. Co., 58 Wis. 338; Bank v. R. R.…

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.. The defendant in error, plaintiff below, recovered judgment against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for damages for the alleged negligent destruction by fire of certain buggj.es upon defendant’s right of way, the buggies having therefore been consigned to her and shipped over defendant’s line of railway to Garland, Wyoming. The .specific acts constituting the alleged negligence were the permitting of rubbish and inflammable material to accumulate on defendant’s right of way and a defective spark arrester in defendant’s engine whereby sparks were allowed to escape,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. AllbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Murray v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Johnston v. VukelicWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pullman Co. v. FinleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bogdon v. Los Angeles & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Owl Creek Coal Co. v. GolebCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API