Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Miller

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 26, 1940No. Nos. 69, 70, 76, 81PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

With slight and immaterial variations, the same facts apply in each of the above cases.

The question involved is whether the defendant Harold O’Brien, as an assignee, is entitled to collect the proceeds of four different insurance policies issued on the life of Richard G. Miller and wherein other defendants are named as beneficiaries.

It is the contention of the said O’Brien that the premium payments on such insurance were made out of funds wrongfully and fraudulently obtained by the assured, and that therefore he became and was a trustee ex maleficio for the benefit of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Jones v. Van DorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Little v. GarabrantNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Vorlander v. KeyesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Sweet v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Mobile v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Dodge Motor Trucks, Inc. v. First National Bank of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Dodge Motor Trucks, Inc., a Corporation v. First National Bank of Omaha, a Corporation, Dodge Motor Trucks, Inc., a Corporation v. First National Bank of Omaha, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  4. First National Bank of Mobile v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. O'Brien v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API