Legal Opinion

Appeal of School Administrative Unit 44

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 22, 2011No. 2010-161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

This case concerns the termination of the respondent, Judith McGann, as superintendent of the petitioner, School Administrative Unit #44 (SAU). The SAU seeks review of the State Board of Education’s decision that its failure to provide pre-hearing discovery with respect to its expert witness denied McGann a meaningful right to cross-examine that witness. McGann cross-appeals, alleging numerous violations of her procedural due process rights under both the State and Federal Constitutions. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

The record supports the following facts. In 2004,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Abourezk v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Appeal of Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. Appeal of Annelie MullenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  3. Appeal of BlizzardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  4. Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API