Hughes v. Kisela
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
IKUTA, Circuit Judge, with whom KOZINSKI, TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, and N. R. SMITH, Circuit Judges,
join, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:
The panel opinion that we let stand today directly contravenes the Supreme Court’s repeated directive not to frame clearly established law in excessive force cases at too high a level of generality. See, e.g., White v. Pauly, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 548, 552, 196 L.Ed.2d 463 (2017) (per curiam). Rather than ask the correct question — whether Officer Kisela’s split-second decision in “the specific context of the case” was “plainly incompetent”…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.