Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hughes v. Kisela

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 28, 2016No. 14-15059Published

1Dissent

IKUTA, Circuit Judge, with whom KOZINSKI, TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, and N. R. SMITH, Circuit Judges,

join, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:

The panel opinion that we let stand today directly contravenes the Supreme Court’s repeated directive not to frame clearly established law in excessive force cases at too high a level of generality. See, e.g., White v. Pauly, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 548, 552, 196 L.Ed.2d 463 (2017) (per curiam). Rather than ask the correct question — whether Officer Kisela’s split-second decision in “the specific context of the case” was “plainly incompetent”…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API