Searls v. Worden
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, D. J.
This is an application to fix a penalty for contempt in selling 62 gross of whip-sockets in violation of an injunction against the sale of such sockets, which had been adjudged to be an *717infringement of complainant’s patent. The sockets were sold in bulk to one Havens, upon the day the injunction was issued, and Havens thereafter disposed of them in small lots, received the money therefor, and paid it over to the defendant. This sale to Havens was, under the circumstances, adjudged by this court to be merely a subterfuge, the defendant Worden was adjudged guilty of contempt, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hayes v. FischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People v. SpaldingNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- People ex rel. Hawley v. BennettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- In re MulleeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Merchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Christensen Engineering Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Knapp v. McFarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931