Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Goss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1923No. 10626PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is an action for the recovery of land and to set aside a sheriffs deed, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against' plaintiff in error, defendant below.

Upon trial to tbe court there was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will ,be designated “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

It appears from the record that the plaintiff claims the ten-acre tract of land involved by separate purchases from one S. P. lies and the Lost Horse Mining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Purcell v. CorderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Fulkerson v. MaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Powers v. ScharlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Co. v. CesarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Devin v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Cherry v. CherrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Coghill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. HARTLESS v. CLINECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API