Barletta Co. v. City of Leominster
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtToomey, J.
In the underlying action the plaintiff, The Barletta Company, Inc. (Barletta) has asserted a variety of claims against the City of Leominster (Leominster), Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. (MScE) and Environmental Operating Services, Inc. (EOS) for economic damages Barletta allegedly sustained due to actions *148undertaken by the defendants which caused Barletta to be deprived of payment for services it rendered to Leominster. Leominster, M&E and EOS have filed separate motions for summary judgment, alleging that they are entitled to entry of judgment in their favor as to all counts of Barletta’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WonsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812