Legal Opinion

Barletta Co. v. City of Leominster

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 8, 1993No. 85-31736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtToomey, J.

In the underlying action the plaintiff, The Barletta Company, Inc. (Barletta) has asserted a variety of claims against the City of Leominster (Leominster), Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. (MScE) and Environmental Operating Services, Inc. (EOS) for economic damages Barletta allegedly sustained due to actions *148undertaken by the defendants which caused Barletta to be deprived of payment for services it rendered to Leominster. Leominster, M&E and EOS have filed separate motions for summary judgment, alleging that they are entitled to entry of judgment in their favor as to all counts of Barletta’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WonsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API