Legal Opinion

McClintic Marshall Construction Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 8, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, V. C.

These actions have been consolidated. They were brought under the *541approved March 30th, 1892, and by the decision in the court of errors and appeals in this state in the case of Delafield Construction Co. v. James R. Sayre, Jr., et al., such actions must be brought in the court of chancery.

*540“Act to secure the payment of laborers, mechanics, merchants, traders and persons employed upon or furnishing materials toward the performing of any work in public improvements in cities, towns, townships and other municipalities in this state,”

*541By stipulation of counsel the question of damages…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Sam P. McCullough, Inc. v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Spurgin v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Creditors' Holding Co. v. PerkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API