Legal Opinion

Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Bates

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 7, 1971No. 51047PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

The question to be decided is: Does the Constitution of the United States require a jury trial in a Louisiana State contempt proceeding in which a maximum fine of $1,000, or imprisonment for not more than 12 months, or both, may be imposed? We answer: A trial by jury in such cases is required under recent interpretations of the United States Constitution by the United States Supreme Court.

I

In a suit in the Ninth Judicial District Court for the parish of Rapides by the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners it was adjudged that Fred E. Bates had engaged in the practice of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MayberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Duplantis v. MonteauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. State v. PassmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Pettus v. Atchafalaya Wildlife Protective Soc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API