Legal Opinion

Bray v. Union Nat. Bank of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1917No. 7787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBainey, C. J.

Plaintiff in error, Erminia C. Bray, being a married woman and being joined by her husband, did in 1910, in the city of Dallas, Tex., sign as surety two promissory notes, and to secure payment of same did execute a mortgage on certain lots in the city of Hugo, Choctaw county, Okl., said lots being her separate property. Said notes becoming due and default in payment being made, suit was brought thereon in Choctaw county, Okl., and judgment was rendered for the amount of same and foreclosure of said mortgage on said lots, which were sold by virtue of said judgment and proceeds of sale credited…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Norwood v. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Houston v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. American Express Co. v. North Ft. Worth Undertaking Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baumgardner v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Baughan v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Hecht v. AltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Rumpf v. RumpfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Rumpf v. RumpfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API