Bryan v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Actioh tried before Allen, J., at November Term, 1916, of WilsoN, upon tírese issues: 1. Did tbe defendant, tbe Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, agree with the plaintiff that it would furnish a car of sufficient size and strength to carry 26 head of horses and mules from East St. Louis, in the State of Illinois, to Wilson, in the State of North Carolina, safely and so that said horses and mules would not be crowded therein? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the defendant, the…
Read the full summary
Actioh tried before Allen, J., at November Term, 1916, of WilsoN, upon tírese issues: 1. Did tbe defendant, tbe Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, agree with the plaintiff that it would furnish a car of sufficient size and strength to carry 26 head of horses and mules from East St. Louis, in the State of Illinois, to Wilson, in the State of North Carolina, safely and so that said horses and mules would not be crowded therein? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the defendant, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, furnish to the plaintiff at East St. Louis, in the State of Illinois, a car…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
There are a large number of assignments of error, but we will consider only those directed to the stipulation in the bill of lading relating to notice, viz.: “As a condition precedent to the shipper’s right to recover any damages for loss or injury to said animals, be will give notice in writing of bis claim thereof to the agent of the railroad company or other carrier from whom be received said animals, before said animals are removed from the place of destination above mentioned, or from the place of delivery of the same to said shipper, and before said animals are mingled witb other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Metz Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Moser v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Washington Horse Exchange v. L. & N. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mewborn v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- White v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Aman v. Dover & Southbound RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Carbic Manufacturing Co. v. Western Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Mann v. Fairfield & Elizabeth City Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.