Legal Opinion

Skog v. King

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The material facts are not in dispute. On November 22, 1931, the plaintiff and the defendant owned and occupied adjoining farms. The plaiptiff was the owner of a dog, trained to hunt raccoons. The defendant was the owner of a Spitz dog, kept by him as a pet. On the night of November 22, 1931, after the defendant and his family had retired, he was awakened by the noise of dogs fighting in his yard. At that time he owned a number of 'sheep which were kept in a corral west of his barn. He arose, went out of doors, taking his shotgun with him. He observed that his sheep were scattered all over…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sabin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Anderson v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  3. State v. ChurchillIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Nesbett v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. McChesney v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GettySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. State v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Bass v. NofsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Campenni v. WalrathCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API