Campenni v. Walrath
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Jeanine Mason Campenni and Frank J. Campenni appeal from a judgment awarding them $68,600 for injuries sustained by Jeanine as she attempted to protect her dogs from the Walraths' Irish Wolfhound. The Campennis claim that they should have been awarded double damages under sec. 174.02(l)(b), Stats. The issue before us is whether a dog is "property" as that word is used in sec. 174.02(l)(b). We hold that a dog does not constitute property under sec. 174.02(l)(b), and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. We do not address the other issues raised on appeal because this issue is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- J.A.L. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Nelson v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- C.A.K. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kluth v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Campenni v. WalrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994