Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. United Mine Workers of America

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1947No. 759Published

1DissentJustice Rutledge

This case became a cause célebre the moment it began. No good purpose can be served by ignoring that obvious fact. But it cannot affect our judgment save only perhaps to steel us, if that were necessary, to the essential and accustomed behavior of judges.1 In all cases great or small this must be to render judgment evenly and dispassionately according to law, as each is given understanding to ascertain and apply it.

*343No man or group is above the law. Nor is any beyond its protection. In re Yamashita, 327 U. S. 1, dissenting opinion, 41. These truths apply equally to the Government. When its…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API