Legal Opinion

Shillinglaw v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1938No. 7463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge..

This is a petition to review an order of the Board of Tax Appeals redetermining a deficiency in petitioner’s income taxes for the calendar year 1928 in the amount of $1,230.47. 32 B.T.A. 1235.

The question at issue is whether the petitioner is subject to tax on the sale of capital assets under the provisions of Section 101 of the Revenue Act of 1928, Chap. 852, 45 Stat. 791, 26 U.S.C.A. Section 2101 (a) (b) (c), 26 U.S.C.A. § 101 note. The parties have, stipulated that the decision in this case will control the cases of H. H. Campbell, deficiency $6,423.43; W. T. Hale,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neilson & Kittle Canning Co. v. F. G. Lowe & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Maxwell v. DurhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Calcara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Dillard & Coffin Co. v. Beley Cotton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. CrumesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. KieselbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Ottenberg v. OttenbergDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  3. Boykin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API