Legal Opinion

Couch v. Wa. Dep't of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 8, 2002No. 26784-5-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

54 P.3d 197 (2002)

113 Wash.App. 556

Richard Lee COUCH, et al., Respondents,

v.

WA. DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant.

No. 26784-5-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

September 20, 2002.

As Amended November 8, 2002.

Michael Patrick Lynch, Glen Andrew Anderson, Steven Ray Meeks, Assistant Attorneys General, Michael E. Tardif, Asst. Atty. Gen. - Dl&i, Olympia, WA, for Appellant.

John Robert Connelly, Darrell L. Cochran, Gordon Thomas Honeywell, Tacoma, WA, for Respondents.

MORGAN, J.

The main question in this case is whether the Department of Corrections (DOC) owes a duty of care to prevent…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Mason CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Estate of Bordon v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Terrell C. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Joyce v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Estate of Davis v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API