Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1965No. S. F. 21595PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Plaintiffs, the landlords of defendant, appeal from a judgment for defendant determining, in an action for declaratory relief, that the landlords, as between them and the tenant, should bear the expense of an increase in property taxes caused by certain improvements constructed by the tenant on the demised premises.

On April 6, 1960, the landlords leased certain unimproved real property in Palo Alto to the tenant for a term of approximately three years, with two successive options granted to the tenant to extend the term for a period of up to three years on each option. Thus, the lease could,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phinney v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Callahan v. Broadway National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Beck v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  4. La Paul v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. City of Oakland v. Albers Bros. Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roban Realty, Inc. v. FaileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Nesley v. Rockwood Spring Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API