City of Oakland v. Albers Bros. Milling Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Ezra W. Decoto, District Attorney, James M. Koford, Assistant District Attorney, H. L. Hagan, City Attorney, and John J. Earle, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
[1] This action was instituted by the city of Oakland to collect from the defendant certain taxes alleged to be due said city. The cause was submitted to the trial court for decision upon an agreed statement of facts which may be summarized as follows: On February 16, 1916, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a certain written lease of certain lands upon the western waterfront of the said city of Oakland, the same being a portion of the public lands granted by the state to the city of Oakland in trust for certain purposes under the provisions of an act of the legislature approved May…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- City of San Francisco v. McGinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cryan v. WardellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1920
- Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Maricopa County v. Fox Riverside Theatre Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. DegnanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Alexander v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.