Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 23, 2001No. 01-0116-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VERGERONT, EJ.

¶ 1. Joel Feterson challenges the repeater penalty portions of his sentences for two counts of second-degree intentional homicide, to which he pleaded guilty as a repeater as part of a plea agreement. He contends that the repeater portion of each sentence is void because, at the time he entered his pleas of not guilty at the arraignment, neither the complaint nor the information charged him as a repeater as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.12(1) (1999-2000). Therefore, he asserts, the trial court lacked authority to sentence him as a repeater, even though the information was amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Block v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  2. State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State v. OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Julie A.B. v. Circuit Court for Sheboygan CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API