Legal Opinion

Surprenant v. Burlingham

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. AC 20407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The plaintiff, Ronald Surprenant, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, John Burlingham, after the court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant was not engaged in the “operation” of a motor vehicle at the time of the accident that gave rise to the plaintiffs injuries and (2) rendered summary judgment notwithstanding the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendant was exercising control and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Chairman, Criminal Justice Commission v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arias v. GeisingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Muscetta v. Kimball, No. Cv01 0186306 SConnecticut Superior Court · 2002
  3. Rodriguez v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API