Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Womack

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1917No. 8030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Bryan County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Suit by W. O. Womack against W. H. Phelps and others. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict, and certain defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WEST, C.

This is a suit instituted by W. O. Womack in the district court of Bryan county, Okla., against W. I-I. Phelps, W. C. Hatcher, Tom E. Dillan, J. R. Bryant, C. A. Bilbo, and J- O. Hartzog, to recover on promissory note. A copy of said note and indorsements is as follows:

‘Uaddo, Okla., Dec. 4. 1912.

“$2,400.00 Due Jan. 15, 1913.
“The Caddo National Bank of Caddo.
“January 15th, 1913, after date, without grace, for value received, we or either of us, jointly and severally, promise to pay to the order of the Caddo National Bank twenty-four hundred and no/100 dollars, at its office…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Goshen National Bank v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Mayers v. McRimmon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Carter v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. HembreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. White v. City Nat. Bank of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API