Legal Opinion

Brourman v. Gorokhovsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant failed to meet his prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The papers the defendant submitted failed to adequately address the plaintiffs claim, set forth in the bills of particulars, that the plaintiff sustained a medically determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Reynolds v. Wai Sang LeungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Tinsley v. BahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexander v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Alexander v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API