Brourman v. Gorokhovsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant failed to meet his prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The papers the defendant submitted failed to adequately address the plaintiffs claim, set forth in the bills of particulars, that the plaintiff sustained a medically determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Reynolds v. Wai Sang LeungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Tinsley v. BahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alexander v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Alexander v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012