Legal Opinion
Tinsley v. Bah
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 22, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Mamadou S. Bah appeals, and the defendant Adam Chilicki separately appeals, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated October 4, 2007, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The defendants Mamadou S. Bah and Adam Chilicki, although separately…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Sayers v. HotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Torres v. Performance Automobile Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- DeVille v. BarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Joseph v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by12 opinions
- Che Hong Kim v. KossoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Neuburger v. SidorukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Saldarriaga v. MorenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Brourman v. GorokhovskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lopez v. KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.