Legal Opinion

Darby Candy Co. v. Hoffberger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City (Dobler, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

The appellant, is a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of candy in Baltimore City. The appellee is engaged in the .livery and stable business of hiring and boarding horses for compensation in Baltimore City.

This suit was brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for the loss of two horses belonging to. the appellee, and hired to the appellant.

The declaration contains two counts, and they set out the-causes of action. The first count charges that among the horses so hired was a spotted-sorrel horse and at the time of the happening of the injury, on or about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. President of the Baltimore & Yorktown Turnpike Road v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  2. Bannon ex rel. Coughlan v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  3. American District Telegraph Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. County Commissioners v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  5. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co. v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. J. E. Smith Co. v. SmickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Leckie v. ClemensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API