Legal Opinion

Leckie v. Clemens

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 9, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Dumr, J.). Tho following prayers were among those offered: Plaintiff’s Sixth Prayer — The jury is instructed that the measure of damages in this, ease shall be the value of the suits, dresses, shoes and other contents of the trunks at the time the goods were stolen including the damage to- said trunk with interest in their discretion from November 17th, 1915. Which the Court modified as follows: The jury is instructed that if they find…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Dumr, J.). Tho following prayers were among those offered: Plaintiff’s Sixth Prayer — The jury is instructed that the measure of damages in this, ease shall be the value of the suits, dresses, shoes and other contents of the trunks at the time the goods were stolen including the damage to- said trunk with interest in their discretion from November 17th, 1915. Which the Court modified as follows: The jury is instructed that if they find for plaintiff that the measure of damages in this case shall be the value of the suits, dresses, shoes and other contents…

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment recovered by the plaintiff, the appellee in this Court, against the appellant for the loss of goods stored in the defendant’s warehouse in the City of Baltimore. The record contains seven exceptions to the rulings of the Court. One upon the prayers and the others to the admission or rejection of testimony.

The plaintiff offered six prayers, all of which were refused as offered, but his sixth prayer was granted after modification by the Court. This modified prayer was properly granted, as it correctly states the measure of damages to which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cumins v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. American District Telegraph Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co. v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. Security Storage & Trust Co. v. DenysCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Darby Candy Co. v. HoffbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Denning Warehouse Co. v. WidenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. National Fire Ins. Co. v. MoganOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Rudy v. Quincy Market Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API