Modern Woodmen of America v. Casados
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
Upon the hearing of plaintiff’s motion for temporary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss the bill, defendants announced their intention to stand upon their motion to dismiss. Accordingly this court, after due consideration, directed entry of a final decree.1 Defense counsel then asked to be relieved of their election to stand on their motion to dismiss the bill upon the ground that they had assumed this court would decide a constitutional question which was of interest to them in cases pending in other courts; that since the court was not beguiled into…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CasadosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Biel v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Wheeler v. Ben Hub Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
- In re PerkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981