Legal Opinion
United States v. Kearns
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1940No. 2090PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs seek recovery under a policy of war risk insurance admittedly lapsed for non-payment of premiums due April 1, 1919, unless kept in force by the provisions of § 516, 38 U.S.C.A.
Roy H. Kearns entered the military service of the United States May 21, 1918, and was honorably discharged March 29, 1919. While in the service he applied for and was granted a term insurance contract by the government, in the sum of $10,000, effective September 1, 1918. The beneficiaries in the policy are the plaintiffs herein. The last premium payment made on the policy was for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dennison v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- United States ex rel. Lyons v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- United States v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M. C. Mock v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Landreth v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. NessmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967