In re Mitchell-Borne Const. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
In the matter of the liquidation of the Mitchell-Borne Construction Company. A judgment was entered appointing a receiver to the company to succeed the original receiver, who had absconded, and William F. Kelly, one of the partners, applies for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
The petition of the relator represents in substance that he was a mem*519ber of a partnership known as the Mitchell-Borne Construction Company, composed of Michael Mitchell, Benjamin F. Borne, William F. Kelly, and John O. Chisholm, which was organized for the purpose of carrying out a large contract with the sewerage and water board of the city of New Orleans for constructing a part of the drainage, sewerage, and water system of said city; that the operation of said partnership from its beginning to its end will involve the expenditure and disbursement of several hundred thousand dollars; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Macready v. SchenckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
- McNair v. GourrierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
- State ex rel. Dubuisson v. Judge of the Second District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Notrebe v. McKinneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
- Pratt v. McHattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- Posey v. FargoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Succession of DamicoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Sklar v. KahleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Levy v. Bonfouca Hunting ClubSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Posey v. FargoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.