Succession of Damico
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Applicátion by Antonio Damico and another for the appointment of an administrator for the succession of Jake Damico, opposed by Armantine Rolland Damico. The last-named party was appointed, and a sus-pensive appeal was denied, and the original petitioners apply for writs of certiorari and mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
By Division B, composed of Justices O’NIEtLL, LAND, and BAKER.
BAKER, J.
Antonio and Joseph Damico, being, respectively, the father and brother *889of the deceased, Jake. Dami'co, applied for the appointment of the brother,' or, in the alternative, of the father, as administrator of the succession. The application was opposed by Mrs. Armantine Rolland Damico, who claimed that she was the'widow of Jake Damico, and was therefore entitled to be appointed administratrix of his succession. Antonio and Joseph Damico contested the validity of the marriage of Armantine Rolland to Jake Damico. On trial of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Serio v. TrainorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Orleans-Kenner Electric Ry. Co. v. Metairie Ridge Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Succession of WattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- State ex rel. Marin v. Parish JudgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
- State ex rel. Widow & Heirs of Pearson v. Parish JudgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Succession of BeattieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Succession of PavelkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Succession of TylerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Whittier v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Ledet v. Succession of LedetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.