Crawford v. Neal
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs, in the Fifth District Court, County of San J oaquin. Booker, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
This was an action to quiet title to a tract of land in San Joaquin County. Some of the plaintiffs to this action are infants, and it is stated in the complaint that they sue by their guardian ad litem, W. S. Buckley; but it is not stated or averred that the guardian was appointed by any order of the Court or judge, so as to authorize him to sue. There is no averment at all as to his appointment; and because there is no such averment, the defendant filed the following special demurrer, to wit: “That the plaintiffs, Charles Hough, Richmond N. Hough, Dela Hough, and John Hough, have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grantman v. ThrallNew York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Estate of CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Security Loan & Trust Co. v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Mabry v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Granger v. SherriffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.