South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHearn, C.J.
Respectfully, I concur in part, and dissent in part. I would reverse and hold that the long-term Tenant is entitled to the portion of the condemnation award which is supported by the only evidence adduced at trial, or, in the alternative, I would reverse and remand to allow the introduction of evidence under the correct method of valuation for a partial taking.
I agree with the majority that only Article. 32(b) of the Lease’s Condemnation Clause applies here, as Tenant had taken possession of the property prior to the institution of the condemnation proceeding. Additionally, the order of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Langley v. BoyterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Gordon v. DrewsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.