Legal Opinion

Foster v. Bowles

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1903No. S.F. No. 2358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage made on December 2, 1887, by the defendant Bowles to Alexander Montgomery, deceased, in the lifetime of the latter. The complaint alleges that in March, 1892, the defendant Bowles conveyed the mortgaged premises to the defendant Hatch, and that the latter then agreed to pay to Montgomery the balance of $20,000 then due on the note and mortgage, together with interest according to the terms of the said note. The appellant, Sherman, .Clay & Co. (a corporation), was made defendant in the suit, for the reason, as alleged in the complaint,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dayton v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Raggio v. PalmtagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. First National Bank of Parks Rapids v. PrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. City of Napa v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API