Ex parte Garland
Supreme Court of Alabama
Tue nature of this proceeding and the facts in relation thereto, are so fully stated in the opinions of the judges, it is unnecessary bo repeat them here.
1Opinion of the CourtA. J. Walker, C. J.
Arcase was upon the docket of the circuit court of Barbour county, wherein one Moses was the plaintiff and the relator was the defendant, and the alleged cause of action was a promissory note. The defendant made a motion,, addressed to the circuit court, *560to strike tbe ease from tbe docket. Upon this motion evidence was received, and the court, upon the evidence and the law, rendered judgment overruling the motion, and a bill of exceptions was taken setting forth the evidence upon which the motion was decided. A motion is now made for a rule nisi to the circuit judge, to show cause why a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Lamar v. Commissioners' Court of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Drinkard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Ex parte MahoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Harrall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Fisher v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Ex parte HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.