Legal Opinion

York v. Mims

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 26, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Settle —

Affirming.

The question presented for decision by this appeal is, whether certain words alleged in the petition to have been maliciously and falsely spoken of the appellant by appellee are slanderous per se and, therefore, actionable. The words complained of, as set out in the petition, as amended, are contained in two paragraphs, the first being as follows:

“Mr. York walked into my office and, without my permission, taken from my desk private papers containing a check for $55.00, my own private papers, and if he does not send them back to me I will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Curtis v. IsemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Renaker v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Wooten v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Sengel v. PiersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plummer v. Commercial Tribune Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Skillern v. BrookshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Decker v. Kentucky Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API