Legal Opinion

Sengel v. Pierson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 16, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*781Opinion of the Court by Chief

Justice Settle

Affirming .

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Campbell circuit court sustaining a general demurrer to the appellant’s petition and dismissing the action at her cost. The action was brought by the appellant, Nora Sengel, against the appellee, Joseph W. Pierson, seeking to recover of him damages for certain alleged slanderous words charged to have been falsely and maliciously spoken and published by him of and concerning her, in the presence of Louisa Stiddle and divers other persons.

The following are the alleged slanderous words complained of:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Curtis v. IsemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Renaker v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Wooten v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Tharp v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winterton v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. Plummer v. Commercial Tribune Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. York v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API