Ware v. Hill
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson', Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) All the special grounds assert in substance that the court erred in failing to charge the jury that, if the evidence showed that the testatrix left a child surviving her, then a verdict should be rendered for the propounder, in that in such circumstances the caveatrix, Mrs. Hill, would not be an heir at law, because under the undisputed evidence Mrs. Hill was a sister of the deceased, and there was some testimony that Mrs. Tinie Keeter Martin was a daughter of the testatrix, and the failure to so instruct the jury as claimed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manley v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Pantone v. PantoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Brock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Fehn v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
3Cited by12 opinions
- Northwestern University v. CrispSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Borenstein v. BlumenfeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Mallis v. MiltiadesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Kievman v. KievmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Dean v. MorsmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.