Legal Opinion

Akerly v. Vilas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Dane County. The plaintiff demurred to the answer for insufficiency, and appealed from an order overruling the' demurrer. The substance of the complaint and answer is stated in 15 Wisconsin Reports, pp. 402-407.

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

In deciding the appeal formerly brought in this case from the order refusing to dissolve the injunction, we necessarily passed upon the question now presented, so far as to hold that the demurrer to the defendant’s answer was properly overruled. We do not feel called upon now to go further and decide all the questions presented by the answer, as the respondent’s cou-n *704sel desired us to do. It does not yet appear that they have been passed on by the circuit court. If we should now decide them, the case would still have to be tried upon the evidence, and we shall therefore leave them for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. LangworthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolick v. GallagherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sentinel Co. v. ThomsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. July v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bolick v. GallagherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API