Legal Opinion

McCartney v. McCartney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1935No. 29180PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover judgment for monthly instalments of $60 each, which Harold G. McCartney, defendant, obligated himself by written contract to pay to Mary Charles McCartney, plaintiff, for the support of their daughter during the latter’s minority. The contract was executed when the parties to it were husband and wife, but living apart from each other. The husband deserted *672his wife and she procured a divorce from him without an allowance for alimony or a judicial order committing to her the custody of the child who lives with her mother by-agreement of the parents. Plaintiff and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dayton Spice-Mills Co. v. SloanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Coffman v. BrandhoefferNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Merchants National Bank v. JaffrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cox & Cornell v. Peoria Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Caulfield v. BittengerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Insurance Company of North America v. KuninNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API