Legal Opinion
Caulfield v. Bittenger
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1893No. 4929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from the district court of Dawes county. Tried below before Grites, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is a proceeding in error and brings up for review the judgment of the district court of Dawes county reversing an order of the county judge of said county, overruling the motion of the defendants in error to discharge an attachment issued at the instance of the plaintiff in error. The material facts are as follows: On the 9th day of March, 1891 the plaintiff in error, Caulfield, filed with the county judge an account of which the following is a copy :
*543“ John S. Caulfield
v.
Guy L. Bittenger,
Ralph R. Bittenger.
“Bought of John S. Caulfield.
3890.
Nov. 18. To merchandise, per bill rend.........…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seidentopf v. AnnabilNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dayton Spice-Mills Co. v. SloanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Cox & Cornell v. Peoria Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- National Reefer Service, Inc. v. FelmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- McCartney v. McCartneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935