Legal Opinion

People v. Austin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated December 6, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender based upon a “presumptive override” factor, namely, that the defendant had “a prior felony conviction for a sex crime,” is supported by clear and convincing evidence and, thus, should not be disturbed (see People v *917Juarbe, 36…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. ClinkscalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. LambertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. JuarbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. IorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API