People v. Austin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated December 6, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender based upon a “presumptive override” factor, namely, that the defendant had “a prior felony conviction for a sex crime,” is supported by clear and convincing evidence and, thus, should not be disturbed (see People v *917Juarbe, 36…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ClinkscalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. LambertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. JuarbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. IorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010