Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pending before the court are defendant Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation’s and defendant St. Columba Church’s [collectively “the defendants”] motions to dismiss the seventh and tenth counts asserted by plaintiff Jane Doe in her second amended complaint filed on August 1, 2003. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES defendants’ motions to dismiss. (Docs.. #46 and #49).
I. Procedural History and Facts
Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under fictitious name, initiated this action against the Norwich • Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation, St. Columba…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- United States v. Yale New Haven HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Easton v. SundramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis v. Bellows Falls Congregation of Jehovah's WitnessesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
- Doe v. Mercy High School Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Lawrence v. Center Properties LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020