Legal Opinion

Sauchelli v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment to declare that a certain cul-de-sac is not a public street and for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint after trial. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Revocation of an offer of dedication of land to public use is not effective unless “ made by all the parties who have a legal interest in the lands subject to the offer of dedication to public use.” (White v. Moore, 161 App. Div. 400, 403; see, also, Bridges v. Wychoff, 67 N. Y. 130, and Russell v. Church, 118 Misc. 473.) It is apparent from the proof that appellants did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. White v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Russell v. ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Underhill Avenue Corp. v. Village of Croton-on-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API