People v. Dogan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: A photograph of the. infant victim’s vagina was properly admitted into evidence. Although it was prejudicial, the photo was probative on the issue of penetration, corroborated the victim’s testimony, and illustrated the medical testimony (see, People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 369, cert denied 416 US 905; People v Brakefield, 156 AD2d 1004, lv denied 75 NY2d 917). Defendant failed to preserve for review any issue concerning the propriety of the court’s charge. In any event, the court’s interested witness charge was proper in all respects (see, People v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. PoblinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. AgostoNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. GroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. StebbinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- MADISON, ALONZO, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013