Peltier v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
In this appeal from a conviction for manufacture of methamphetamine the judgment must be reversed for the simple but basic reason that the State and accused never joined issue before the jury. The materials used to produce methamphetamine and a quantity of methamphetamine were seized by peace officers while executing a search warrant, and because of the likelihood of a new trial we will address one challenge to the sufficiency of the affidavit presented to the magistrate to obtain the search warrant. We decline to treat other grounds since they are not likely to reoccur…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Heredia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Essary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Schmidt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.