Legal Opinion
Burgos v. GROUP & PENSION ADMINISTRATORS, INC.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 13, 2003No. CIV.A.H-03-0989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
Maria Burgos alleges that after she had surgery, Group & Pension Administrators, Inc., (“GPA”), Tex-Trude, L.P., and Tex-Trude, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan (collectively “Tex-Trude”) •wrongfully denied her benefits under a medical care plan. Bur-gos asserts state law statutory causes of action under the Texas Insurance Code, art. 21.21 §§ 4-16 and 21.21-2; the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (“DTPA”), Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code §§ 17.46, 17.50; and common law causes of action including negligence, negligence per se, intentional infliction of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holick v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Vest v. The Nissan Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan IIDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022