Peter S. Karlow v. William Fitzgerald
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff and defendant were neighbors. Defendant’s bulldog, named Bow ser, went onto plaintiff’s premises without the plaintiff’s having shown any prior manifestation of consent to such entry. Plaintiff testified on his direct examination that when the defendant’s dog came upon his premises it first attacked him by biting him on the arm, and then jumped on his dog. From other testimony it may perhaps be inferred that plaintiff suffered the injury complained of as a result of an attempt to separate the fighting dogs. It is difficult to say from the record that this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Dickson v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Drew v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Frederick O. Gaither v. Charles R. Myers and American Motorist Insurance Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Fannie K. Hertz v. Elizabeth N. Graham, Individually and Doing Business as Maine Chance FarmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- H.R.H. Construction Corp. v. Denis ConroyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Warwick v. MulveySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.