Legal Opinion

Active Fire Sprinkler Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover the proceeds of a business interruption insurance policy, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), entered March 11, 1992, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a protective order and denied its cross motion to compel the plaintiff to produce documents demanded in its first set of interrogatories.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

After the plaintiff commenced this action to recover under an insurance policy for business interruption, the defendant served interrogatories demanding, inter alia, the plaintiffs tax…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayo, Lynch & Associates, Inc. v. FineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Glenmark, Inc. v. CarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Panasuk v. Viola Park Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Briand Parenteau, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Rubinfeld v. ZwerlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API