Legal Opinion
Emerald City Pet Rescue v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 2, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01843Unknown
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 EMERALD CITY PET RESCUE, CASE NO. C24-1843-JCC 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 11 v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 12 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court conducted a bench trial in 16 this insurance garnishment action, where Plaintiff Emerald City Pet Rescue (“ECPR”) sought to 17 recover damages and attorney fees from Defendants Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 18 (“LMIC”) and Ohio Security Insurance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. v. T & G CONST., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. RaynorWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Riley v. VIKING INSURANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.